Kamis, 26 Juni 2008

Identical Korean Fashion

Dear Korean,

Why do Koreans stress so much about the outer appearance? Women would not be caught dead not wearing makeup, it's all about the 명품 and imports, and if you're not wearing the latest trend, then you're looked down on. I realized this when I was in Korea as an exchange student a couple of years ago. People were shocked that I did not WANT to wear makeup and that I didn't care what brand the clothes were. I know American and Korean cultures are different and all, but I wonder when and why Koreans began to think this way.

Confused Within

Dear Confused,

There are two sides to the question you ask, and the Korean will address each in turn.

First, you have to realize your own perspective. If you were an exchange student into Korea, most likely you went to one of the universities in the middle of Seoul, and you probably spent a lot of time hanging out with Korean people who can speak English well, in the neighborhoods they frequent.

You know what is common among Korean people who can speak English well? THEY ARE ALL RICH. Not necessarily filthy rich, but rich enough to spend a lot of money on clothes and makeup. And when that option is available for people (men and women alike,) some people go completely nuts. This is not unique to Korea; worldwide, you will find that rich people generally care more about their outer appearance, simply because they can afford to. Conversely, if you knew poorer people in Korea, you would realize that fetishizing the latest trend is not as widespread as you would think.

(Reminds the Korean of a line from Holy Grail – one can tell a king is a king because “he hasn’t got shit all over him.”)




(And the Korean just spent 20 minutes reading all the quotes from Holy Grail on imdb.com. It’s a slow day at work. Back to the post.)

But your general observation is valid – Generally Korean people, especially women, care a lot more about outward appearance than Americans. Why?

The Korean already answered it in this post. Here are the relevant parts:

“… Korea went from pre-modern to post-modern, the process that took other countries about 150 years, in about 40 years.

Truth is, all pre-modern, agriculture-based societies are conformist. Such societies usually consist of tight-knit communities, whose members must all cooperate in order to earn a living. (Think of the Amish community for an American example.) Homogeneity is a natural outgrowth of such societies.

The Korean will say this point again and again until everyone understands this - ONLY 40 YEARS AGO, KOREA WAS POORER THAN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. So although the miraculous economic growth took Korea to the forefront of modernity, Korea continues to drag its cultural baggage from the pre-modern, agricultural era.

[A little addition in this part -- see some pictures of Korea in the 1950s. (One Two Three) Absolutely stunning. If you are a Korean in late 20s~early 30s, the children in the pictures are about the same age as your parents. Think about that. Photos courtesy of Marmot.]

Practically, this means that Korean people constantly care about what other people think about them. It doesn't help that Korean tend to live very closer to one another in massive cities, therefore never having a chance to get the hell away from everyone else.

So if a popular trend develops in Korea, Koreans follow that trend without thinking twice about it, because other people do it too. At times, this is a source of great national strength. When there is something that demands a truly national-scale cooperation, like the Olympics or the World Cup, there is no better people than Koreans to extract that cooperation. However, infuriatingly, a trend often makes many Koreans lemmings.”

The original post was about plastic surgery, but this habit towards conformity truly applies in every aspect of Korean life, and in nowhere is it more evident in fashion trends.

There are a few more things to be said about Koreans living very close together. The statement is, first, literally true. Korea has 48 million people, and 20 million of them live in or near Seoul. It’s impossible for Americans to get their head around this idea, except maybe those who live in New York City (which has ¼ population density of Seoul’s.)

But Koreans are also very close in a metaphysical sense. That is, Koreans tend to have a more “inter-connected” relationship to one another. Koreans generally maintain a close relationship with the extended families. Also, in every social group (be it school, work, military unit, etc.,) Koreans are expected to form a personal bond with one another, over and beyond the professional relationship. Although things are changing lately, it is still a poor form for a Korean worker to skip a staff dinner.

In short, Koreans constantly meet, hang out, talk, and drink. And that’s easy to do, because they all live right next to each other! It is like a high school which is a vicious gossip mill, extended over the entire country. In that type of environment, wouldn’t you start caring what other people thought about you?

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@hotmail.com.

Rabu, 25 Juni 2008

58 years ago on June 25, the Korean War began, and the history of Korea took an important turn. Again this year, the Korean would like to express his sincerest gratitude to everyone from all corners of the world who had given up their lives to save Korea.

Senin, 23 Juni 2008

What Makes a Person a Korean?

Dear Korean,

My wife was born and raised in Korea, as was her brother who did obligatory military service. Initially when they came to the US, they felt that one can only be “Korean” if they were born and raised on the Korean peninsula and served in the Korean military, if they were male. Otherwise, people who deserted Korea for economic or educational reasons are former or 1.5 or 2nd
generation Koreans. Like that Cho Seung Hui dude, although he was a Korean national with a Green Card, he really was more so a Korean American since, like you, his family left for greener pastures. Even the Korean press emphasized this point.

What’s your opinion on the matter of “Korean-ness?”

John I.

Dear John,

Profound question – it won’t be easy to answer. The Korean really struggled to organize his thoughts on this topic, and finally he decided to just write in a stream of consciousness. Here it is.

The first reaction by the Korean reading your email was: Why does it matter for anyone to be a Korean? It is not as if being an ethnic Korean entitles you to anything. (To be sure, being a Korean citizen would entitle you to a lot of things, but obviously this is not what we are talking about here.)

But strike that. Being an ethnic Korean does entitle you to one very valuable thing: You are a presumptive member of a large group of people who are predisposed to being friendly to you, i.e. other Koreans.

Why are Koreans predisposed to being friendly to each other? Because it is presumed (usually correctly) that Koreans have shared a common experience. Obviously, Koreans in Korea live in the same land and share their destiny as habitants of the same country. All Korean Americans have experienced immigration directly or indirectly, dealt with the same language and cultural issues, and overcame the same obsessive parents. And there are enough in common between Koreans in Korea and Korean Americans to have the bond that is stronger than two complete strangers.

So when your brother-in-law says someone is Korean and someone is not, he is really evaluating whom to share that bond with. After all, having a ready-made cordiality (friendship may be too strong of a word) is not a trivial thing.

(An aside: Is this racist? The Korean doesn’t think so. On a superficial level, liking someone based on race may appear racist. But that’s not really the reason why Koreans tend to like other Koreans. Koreans like one another because generally there is enough shared experience to provide for an instant friendship. At the end of the day, we will become friends more easily with people who have had similar experience as ours. Race happens to provide a shortcut indicator.)

How to Measure One’s Koreanness?

Then is there any way to determine if someone is Korean? The most obvious first step is whether someone considers his/herself to be a Korean. After all, one cannot be forced into a group identity – group identity is only a part of self-identity, and no one can control the way you regard yourself.

(Here is an interesting example of forced-upon group identity: In 1997, Miss Universe was
Brook Lee, a quarter Korean. Her grandfather was a Korean who immigrated to Hawaii. The Korean media went nuts when Lee won Miss Universe – Look, world’s most beautiful woman has some Korean in her! However, all this attention from Korea bewildered Lee, who said until she was mobbed by Korean media, she did not really consider herself Korean.)

But does subjective acceptance of group identity suffice? It cannot. There have to be some objective barometers because purely subjective measures would be ludicrous. One who is be born outside of Korea from non-Korean parents, has never visited Korea, does not know one word in Korean, dislikes all Korean food, cannot handle even one shot of soju, etc., cannot possibly become Korean by simply believing oneself to be a Korean.

In fact, objective factors, if numerous enough, can overwhelm the importance of subject acceptance. It would be plain stupid if someone who is born and raised in Korea to Korean parents, speaks only Korean and has never left Korea suddenly claim he is no longer Korean.

From this, we can extract a unified theory of Koreanness: Koreanness is about how much, and how well, you buy into the idea of Korean group identity.

In this formula, “how much” refers to the subjective portion. How much do you identify with Korean group identity? Just a few examples about Korean group identity: Do you feel a personal connection to the people in Korean history? Do you cheer for Korean national soccer team? Can you live without Korean food? Does good news or bad news coming out of Korea makes you happy or upset you?

“How well” refers to the objective portion, because this portion would be judged by other people. The “how well” dimension of the same examples about Korean group identity would be: How much do you know about Korean history? Can you name three players in the Korean national soccer team? Do you know how to cook Korean food, or can you recognize well-made Korean food from junk? Do you follow the news coming out of Korea?

Mathematically expressed (because the Korean must enforce the stereotype!), the formula would be:

K = M * W

K = "Koreanness", value ranging from 0 to 1
M = "How Much", value greater than 0 and less than or equal to 1
W = "How Well", value greater than 0 and less than or equal to 1

Value of M and W can be equal to 1 but not 0, so that we can allow for a case where an objectively Korean person subjectively denies Koreanness, or an objectively non-Korean person subjectively accepts Koreanness. Yet for those who are neither objectively nor subjectively Korean, value K would infinitely approach 0, which is the correct result.

But Wait, Here is the Fun Part…


Up to this point, the Korean thinks there is not much disagreement. But the disagreement would come in the answers to the following two questions:

(1) How do you possibly assign numerical value to W? Remember, W is the only thing to which we can give value, because the value of M is self-given, while W is supposed to be an objective measure. Question is, is such a thing even possible? Who is going to determine the weight of each factor, and the gradation of each factor? The Korean is not even sure all individuals whose K value equals 1 would agree on the proper scaling of W value.

(2) Is there a particular minimal value of K that one must attain to be a “Korean”? Everyone would agree that K=1 would be fully Korean, and K=0 (after solving for limit function) would be a non-Korean. But what about K=.5? K =.25?

John’s brother-in-law would answer the two questions thusly (from what the Korean can glean):

(1) Completing military service and living in Korea must factor prominently in the calculation for W value.

(2) Yes. Korean immigrants’ M value would certainly be greater than 0, and their W value may as well be greater than 0. But their W value would not equal to 1, since they left Korea. So there is Korean immigrants’ K value is greater than 0. But John’s brother-in-law does not consider them “Korean”, which means there must be a positive K value under which people are not considered Korean. That K value could be fairly high -- the Korean can picture a situation where a Korean immigrant's M value would be 1 and W value would be .75 (if the person completed the military service but left Korea). The K value would be .75, which would not be enough for John's brother-in-law.

To be sure, these two questions will never be answered in an authoritative way – the answer will completely depend upon the individual. But at least this is a helpful way of thinking about group identity.

Here are the Korean’s answers to the questions:

(1) W value should not matter much, as long as it is just a little greater than 0. Having a little bit of Korean heritage (as little as third- or fourth-generation Korean, i.e. 1/8 or 1/16 Korean, or having spent some portion of one’s life in Korea, or marrying a Korean,) knowing just a few Korean words, enjoying Korean food, etc., would be plenty enough to get a W value a little greater than 0.

Instead, the M value should matter a lot more. In fact, instead of having a gradation, M value might have to be either 1 or infinitely approaching 0, because you either think you are a Korean or you are not. (But the Korean is not ready to rule out the possibility that M could be between 0 and 1 – for example, you could have a person who empathizes with Koreanness a little, i.e. M=.25, and another person who empathizes very strongly, i.e. M=.85).

(2) Yes, but the requisite K value would be very low, such that it can include people with low W value.

So there you have it. The Korean would love to hear your answers the two questions.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@hotmail.com.

RIP, George Carlin.

"You don't pay hookers to have sex with you, you pay them to leave after you are done."

Here are some highly interesting numbers about interracial marriage that involve Asians. Thank you Jennifer K. for the link.

What really astounded the Korean was how Koreans are so likely to out-marry. The Korean initially thought that War Brides Act may have had something to do with this, but this is 2008, nearly 60 years removed from Korean War. And it doesn't explain the fact that Korean men among all Asians are most likely to have black wives.

Kamis, 19 Juni 2008

Diversity at ballpark racing has come a long way. First, a racing chorizo, then racing sushi.

Originally they were going to have a tuna roll, egg roll, and gimbab racing, but they could not afford the riot police.

Rabu, 18 Juni 2008

Here is Your Response, Ray

The Korean firmly believes that general public is intelligent. And for the most part, that belief is validated. The Korean receives good questions over the email, and has smart discussions with people located all over the world.

And then there is Ray.

Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:58:00 -0700
From: [RAY'S EMAIL]
Subject: About Korea please Read
To: AskAKorean@hotmail.com

Hello i seen your website & you said ask a Korean
I have been studying Asian culture for 6 years
really like the K-pop videos ive seen & the Korean people ive met
in the last 2 years on Youtube ive seen alot of

“anti American” videos
ive read several years ago that WE The US. are South Koreas
strongest alley. im a little worried & dissapointed when i see Koreans doing the
stuff they do, ive seen Korea war docementarys & seen the movie
Taegukgi, i speak some Korean/Japanese/chinese
Dont you think North korea is a threat?
Dont you think if USA pulled out North would attack?
havent they threatened the south?
i would like to Korea Reunified under a Peacefull way
i just want Peace & Friendship with Korea
don’t YOU? the korean people WANT Peace?
& Korea to reunifie?
i dont understand how some koreans think if we pull out
Jim jong il would want to give up his empire?
& say ok lets get back together & Have ALL of Korea free.
i doubt he would do that.
Please write back
Ray

From: The Korean
Subject: RE: About Korea please Read
To: [RAY'S EMAIL]
Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 10:36 AM

Dear Ray,

I really hope your first language is not English. I don't understand what you are trying to say -- please try again. Thank you for reading.

The Korean
www.askakorean.net

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:09:24 -0700
From: [RAY'S EMAIL]
Subject: RE: About Korea please Read
To: askakorean@hotmail.com

다시 한번 말씀해 주십시오. - what? - OK
as i stated im an American English is my native language
it was a simple Question.
WHY do south korean youth Favor North korea
Kim jong il over the USA?
Do you think kim jong il will reunifie Korea
in a peacefull way?
- sorry but most of my Chinese friends play dumb
& avoid this qustion & pretend Not to understand.

From: The Korean
Subject: RE: About Korea please Read
To: [RAY'S EMAIL]
Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 1:46 PM

Dear Ray,

Sorry, you had (and still have) numerous misspells and punctuation errors. But your Korean phrase was perfectly written. At least the question now is understandable. I think few Chinese people can answer your question in an intelligent way, so be nice to them.

I have a policy of answering questions in the order received, so you will be at the back of the line, unless you tell me your question is particularly time-sensitive. It takes about 9 to 10 months for an answer. Hope that's ok.

Thanks for reading!

The Korean
www.askakorean.net

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:26:24 -0700
From: [RAY'S EMAIL]
Subject: RE: About Korea please Read
To: askakorean@hotmail.com

Wow numerous misspells and punctuation errors. SO?

you still understood the question. your just Avoiding it.

in the time it took you to write that resoponce

you could have replied to my question & said

Not all koreans feel that, i want USA & Korean relations to be better. OR you could have even said yes i dislike America

i understand how you would want to reply to peoples email in order recieved, BUT 9-10 Months?

Forget it. ill put this on a Blog to prove how Koreans

Don't give a shit about North korean people.

& dont want things to get Better.

From: The Korean
Subject: RE: About Korea please Read
To: [RAY'S EMAIL]
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 4:46 PM

Dear Ray,

"ill put this on a Blog to prove how Koreans

Don't give a shit about North korean people.

& dont want things to get Better."

Your impeccable logic has left me speechless.

The Korean
www.askakorean.net

[As an aside, misspells, bad punctuations, and poor grammar, committed by a English-as-a-first-language person, really piss off the Korean. The Korean himself spent an inordinate amount of effort to speak and write correct English. (Remember, the Korean moved to U.S. at age 16. The Korean did not speak English before that, and this was all before the current "teach English in Korea" trend.) Millions of people all over the world spend ridiculous amount of money to learn correct English. And those who have been blessed enough to naturally speak the language often do not show the proper respect for their blessing. Ray's question was actually good, but the Korean would never tolerate such a mess.]

[Another aside: Ray must have a lot of friends.]

Got a question or comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@hotmail.com.

Even a day later, the Korean is sick to his stomach for the Lakers no-show. Godshitfuckdamnassballs.

Selasa, 17 Juni 2008

Senin, 16 Juni 2008

The Korean has said all along that the moment the so-called "leaders" of the protesters in Korea tried to shift the issue away from what Korean people cared about, the protesters will go home. In other words, unless there was some external event, there was no danger that the protest would morph into broad anti-Americanist protest, random attack against the government, etc.

And this graph on Dong-A Ilbo proves that the Korean was, as he always is, right:


Here is the link from which the graph came.

For those who cannot read Korean, here is the translation. The graph is estimated attendance to protest by date, and notes associated with the date. Blue bar is the attendance estimated by the police, and gray bar is the attendance estimated by the protest organizers.

Protest on June 6, which was the 72-hour candlelight vigil, attracted 56,000 or 200,000, depending on who is counting.

One on June 10, which was the 21st anniversary of June Protests (important event in democratization history of Korea), attracted 80,000/600,000.

One on June 13, which was 6-year anniversary of the death of two middle school girls who sparked a wave of anti-Americanism (don't ask), attracted 15,000/30,000.

Protest on June 14, which was the funeral day of a protester who immolated himself, attracted 12,000/35,000

One on June 15, 8-year anniversary of June 15 Declaration (important event in North-South Korean history), drew 3,000/15,000.

Finally, the protest on June 16, when the protest leaders began adding different political issues on the agenda, drew 1,300/3,000.

This is happening because the protesters are anything but mindless lemmings. They are most certainly not blindly following the "leaders". They know exactly what they are protesting against, and when the message of the protest changes, they go away.

(By the way, mass suicide by lemmings is a myth. The Korean can't help but laugh when people make fun of fan death myth using the lemmings metaphor. "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?")

Kamis, 12 Juni 2008

Selasa, 10 Juni 2008

Two quick things about the very large protest (estimated attendance = 200,000) against Mad Cow Disease-laden beef in Korea today:

- In order to stop the candle-wielding protesters from marching all the way to the Blue House (= presidential residence), the police set up a makeshift Great Wall of Containers on the road. Not only are they hilarious to look at, but also they are another sign that Lee Myong-Bak administration just does not get the idea that every action it does is a communication toward the people. Just imagine what kind of message a big freakin' wall on the way to the Blue House sends to the people.

- Many non-Koreans are quick to dismiss this phenomenon as an irrational mass hysteria. However, the Korean previously wrote that while the protesters may be (regrettably) ill-informed about Mad Cow Disease, the act of protest itself is orderly and rational. Live reports from the scene confirms the Korean. (Article in Korean.)

Especially focus on the news at 9:25 p.m. and 9:55 p.m. At 9:25 p.m., some of the protesters began to build a foam stairs alongside the containers, chanting "Climb over the containers and march to Blue House." However, they were stopped by a larger crowd, who chanted "nonviolence."

At 9:55 p.m., one man was seen trying to burn a blocking police bus by lighting a fire at its fuel tank, but was quickly stopped by the police. Remarkable thing was when the gas leaked out of the bus, protesters yelled "put out the candles" to prevent any fire.

These are examples of why the Korean believes that the protesters are not an unthinking mob. They are, in fact, anything but mindless; for such a large group, they are singularly focused on sending a clear message in a non-violent way.

This, in turn, means that the moment the protest heads towards a different message (broader anti-Americanism, for example,) or turns violent, majority of those people will simply go home. The so-called leaders of the protest actually do not lead anything; rather, it's more appropriate to say they are riding the wave of public opinion. All they can do is maneuver their own direction; they cannot manipulate the direction of the wave.

Senin, 09 Juni 2008

The Korean wonders who at New York Times keep on writing these articles about contemporary Korean society -- does anyone else see articles about Korea in a much greater frequency than other Asian countries (minus China perhaps), or is it just the Korean?

At any rate, today's article is about how Korean fathers are left behind for children to learn English.

Minggu, 08 Juni 2008

The Classic Tip Question

Dear Korean,

I don't like to generalize about any race because it is of course racist, but it just seems that Koreans are the absolute worst tippers of any foreign transplant here. It seems like Koreans that come here are anxious to assimilate in every other aspect. I understand that America is very unique versus Europe and the East but it seems like most people get that point early on. I don't believe it's from maltreatment or a societal thing from your past country. So what it is it? I'm not some disgruntled waiter or even angry about it even though I did work my way through college that way. I'm just curious.

Can't spell it properly but Com sah hameedah and anyo ee ah say yoh!

Roy




Dear Roy,

Ah, the classic question for all minorities – why don’t colored people tip well? (The Mexican version from the Mexican is here.)

The Korean wouldn’t know if Koreans are the worst tippers – it’s not like he ever did any statistical study on this. But from personal experience, it does feel like Koreans in general tip a little lightly. Why could this be?

First, the article that the Mexican cites is absolutely worth reading. If 24 page article scares you too much, here is a 9 page version that focuses less on numbers and more on explanation.
Of course the study did not focus on Koreans, but it did focus on Asians. The relevant passages say:
 “This study also found that Asians tipped less than did Whites. … The Asian-White difference in tipping became smaller and nonsignificant after statistically controlling for each of the following mediators: service, dining-party size, frequency of restaurant patronage, and restaurant identity. Frequency of restaurant patronage and restaurant identity (reflecting differences in restaurant expensiveness, among other things) should both be strongly affected by income, so these two mediators suggest that Asian–White differences in tipping may be attributable to income effects.”
That’s interesting. But what about Koreans? The Korean would go out on a limb and say the tipping problem is mostly confined to first generation immigrants, because from second generation and on, cultural norm about tipping would be pretty difficult not to conform. (Because second generation people actually have non-Korean people in their social circles, and they wouldn’t want to embarrass themselves.)

So what about Koreans that leads to poor tips? As you might have guessed, the 15 percent tip is a uniquely American institution. Europe tips around 10 percent, and Asia including Korea has no tips. In restaurants where foreigners would frequent, e.g. those in a nice hotel, the bottom of the menu tends to say “15% gratuity is included.” But the Korean never learned if 15 percent of the bill actually goes to the waiting staff.

In fact, there is only one occupation in Korea that collects tips: strippers. So tipping anyone in Korea, especially young women, could be a huge insult. (However, if the change is an insignificant amount, say less than a dollar, leaving the change is ok.)

The Korean thinks it’s ultimately a matter of expectation. Americans internalized the tip and sales tax such that when they see a 10 dollar meal, they expect to pay around 14 dollars. But first generation Koreans spent their whole lives in a way that when they see a price tag of 10 dollars, they expect to pay 10 dollars. So when they realize they have to pay more than what is printed on the menu, it feels like they are being ripped off.

Furthermore, when the idea of tipping is first introduced to the newly immigrated, it is not introduced as “money that waiters/waitresses rightfully deserve if they give not-horrible service, because they do not make minimum wage.” Rather, it is introduced as “an incentive payment for good service.”
Now, Koreans generally do not care too much about good service. (The Korean touched upon this topic in this post.) But if they had to pay for it, boy, the service had better be good. It ends up becoming like an old episode of Third Rock from the Sun, where clueless aliens, upon first learning about tipping, decided to incentivize the waitress by adding to and subtracting from a pile of money on the table each time the waitress does anything.

Lastly, (pure conjecture at this point,) it could also be that poor-tipping Koreans tend to be more on the employer side than employee side, since most of the first generation Koreans are entrepreneurs who own businesses, including restaurants. It is possible that they have less sympathy for the travails of the waiting staff. 

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@hotmail.com.

Jumat, 06 Juni 2008

Some people would not believe the Korean that Europe is more racist than America. Well, does this convince you?

-EDIT 6/9/2008- For just this one time, the Korean will indulge the idiots who need everything spelled out. [By the way, if you still think this post is about comparing Germany to Korea, please leave now and don't come back.]

Consider these factors:

1. Germany is an undoubted economic leader of Europe; if we are comparing EU to the U.S., Germany would be like California or New York. As economic leaders do, it sets a trend for the rest of the union to follow.
2. Germany is also the race relations leader of Europe. Given its own history, it bends over backwards trying to quell any level of racism, even at the expense of free speech. (As racist hate speech is illegal.) Other European nations, relatively free of its past, do not take racism as seriously as Germany.
3. The object here was not any random person, but Barack Obama, who is now the world's most famous black politician since Kofi Annan. Any coverage about him in the wrong direction would be certain to become worldwide news.
4. Die Tageszeitung is not some basement-printed flyer, but a major daily newspaper with a circulation of about 86,500 as of last year. Given that German population is about 82 million, slightly more than 1 in 1,000 Germans read the Taz. Considering that the current U.S. population is 304 million, these are some of the newspapers that about 1 in 1,000 Americans read: Orange County Register, Indianapolis Star, San Antonio Express-News, South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Not necessarily the lineup of USA Today, Wall Street Journal and New York Times, but major dailies nonetheless.
5. Also, the Taz is not some nutcase reactionary paper, but a paper respected for its political correctness.
6. Also, the story was on the FRONT FUCKING PAGE. In a major daily, no less than five reporters and three editors check the front page headline before sending it out to the printer. And not one of the presumably well-educated people working for a politically correct workplace thought there was anything wrong with it.

Now, consider this situation. The year is 1996, when Kofi Annan became the first black Secretary-General of the United Nations. (Not the first African, mind you, because Boutros Boutros-Gali was from Egypt.) Orange County Register (in California) runs a front-page story that had a picture of the UN HQ, with a headline that reads: "Uncle Kofi's Cabin". Would this ever happen in America?

Not a chance.

Rabu, 04 Juni 2008

Dear readers,

could somebody help Melissa out?

Dear Korean,

My husband is considering a job in S. Korea. I was wondering if you could refer me to any websites that would help our family gain information and help make the transition and whole experience better. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated!

Melissa

Trouble is, the Korean has no idea what kind of information is out there about this because, well, the Korean never needs it!

Please leave your input in the comment section. Thank you all.

Senin, 02 Juni 2008

Ask A Korean! News: Those Crazy Cows

Note: After reading this post one more time before publishing, the Korean realized there are a lot more interesting things that he left out, such as how a protest happens in a fun way in Korea, how there were so many young students in the protests, and further ineptitude of the Korean right-wing politicos. And then after reading seven pages of draft, the Korean realized he was not getting paid for this. Readers, feel free to contribute on anything this post is missing.

The Korean refrains from talking about Korean politics too much, but this is an exception because it involves the U.S. very much. (But the Korean would bet anything that 95 percent of Americans have no idea about this – Americans are amazingly ignorant about how their own country affects the world.)

Right now there are nightly mass protests in the center of Seoul, gathering anywhere between ten to forty thousand people. Protesters often include students as young as early teenagers. The protests so far have been by and large peaceful, but there have been occasional bouts of violence and injury – there has been pushing and shoving on a mass scale trying to break down barricades, and the police has been using water cannons to suppress the protests, which have reportedly caused severe injuries in some cases, as seen in the pictures.



(As an aside, even though this is a protest involving tens of thousands of people, it is no riot – no indiscriminate violence, and absolutely no looting. Rather, it is more like a slightly disorganized festival, complete with song and dance, albeit politically charged. Koreans arguably have the most fun protests in the world.)

What are they protesting about? (The overly simplistic) Answer: mad cow disease from beef imported from the U.S. To understand this, a little bit of history is in order.

Background: The Sore Point of FTA

It all began with something called KORUS FTA – the Korea-U.S. free trade agreement. It was one of those groundbreaking events that everyone in Korea knew and no one in the U.S. knew. In many areas, the Korean and American governments agreed to remove tariffs and standardize products in order to promote trade. The negotiation took 14 months, and the agreement was signed on April 2, 2007.

KORUS FTA was generally very popular in Korea – in fact, it marked one of the few high points in the former president Roh Moo-Hyeon’s administration. It is also fair to say that from Korea’s point of view, KORUS FTA was very well negotiated, as Korea achieved some very important concessions from the U.S., such as removing tariffs on pickup trucks. However, there was a small yet well-established minority in who staunchly opposed the FTA – i.e. farmers. The agricultural sector in Korea was certain to be swamped by cheaper American product.

Once the agreement was finalized, it was submitted to each country’s legislature in order to be adopted into law. However, both parties agreed that they would leave certain sensitive parts out of the reach of KORUS. One such point was rice and beef import from the U.S., because there were a significant number of Korean farmers who would protest this cause to death. (And to death, the Korean means to death. Self-immolation in protest has been known to happen in this demographic. Linked article is in Korean.)

However, once submitted to the legislatures, the political circumstances of both U.S. and Korea began to change in a way that made the ratification of FTA difficult. On the American side, the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign machine began to run, and one of the battle fronts that the campaign decided to open was the KORUS FTA. As the U.S. economy was going further and further down the sinkhole, the Clinton campaign correctly saw that making economy an issue was a good selling point, and blaming the economic trouble on foreign trade is always an easy route to take for a politician. Because the U.S. did make significant concessions, it was easy to characterize KORUS as an unfair pact that hurts the American working class.

Following her lead, certain Congressmen and Senators vowed that unless Korea opens up its beef market, they would lobby against ratifying KORUS. Instead of ratifying right away as both parties hoped, a year would pass by without any action from either Korea or America.

On the Korean side, new president Lee Myeong-bak was sworn in, and the conservative Grand National Party returned to power after ten years out of the presidency. Because President Lee vowed to be an economy-first and business-friendly executive, everyone expected the approval of FTA would move on smoother on the Korean side. But it is fair to say that no one expected how badly the new administration would fuck up the process.

The Beef with the Negotiation

Korea actually imported a significant amount of American beef up to 2003. However, the first case of BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, i.e. the Mad Cow Disease,) was discovered in the U.S. in Dec. 23, 2003, and that put the end of American beef export to Korea. (Remember all the craziness about mad cow disease in America? It was not too long ago, folks.)

Korean beef market did open up in 2006, but the import was limited to meat only, as BSE is known to be populated in soft tissues such as brain, eyes, certain parts of intestines, certain parts of stomach, and bone marrow in certain parts of vertebrae. There were several fusses over this requirement, as Korean customs repeatedly rejected entire shipments of U.S. beef because it discovered a bone chip in a size of a nail.

President Lee’s administration came in on beginning of 2008, and it needed a visible result right away to convince the people that it cared about the economy. To that end, ratifying KORUS took priority. And to ratify KORUS, the beef market had to open. Given the positive response to KORUS among Korean people, quickly taking care of the prerequisite for KORUS would receive a positive mark. Although protests from farmers would inevitably happen, the people would be behind the measure, especially since President Lee won the election by landslide – this must have been the thought process of the Lee administration.

This concern was compounded by the fact that President Lee would visit the U.S. in late April of this year. In order to personally pressure the U.S. Congress to act on FTA, the prerequisite for KORUS had to be satisfied, and satisfied quickly.

Therefore, on April 18 of this year, Korean government agreed to open its beef market at an undoubtedly favorable term for the U.S. Regarding mad cow disease, these were the terms:

- For cattle that are older than 30 months, every part except seven types of Specified Risk Materials (SRM) are to be imported. Intestines are not included in the seven types.

- For cattle that are younger than 30 months, every part except two types of SRM are to be imported. The two parts are tonsils and one of the stomachs. Note that bones of cattle younger than 30 months are to be imported.

- U.S. is generally required to follow the regulations of OIE (for “Office International des Epizooties” – an office under World Trade Organization that deals with animal health. Don’t you just love the French’s attempt at relevance?). OIE classify countries with BSE risk into three tiers (from low to high): Negligible Risk, Controlled Risk, and Undetermined Risk. Currently U.S. in the Controlled Risk category. Importantly, even if U.S. gets another reported case of BSE, Korea can only stop import only if U.S. moves from Controlled Risk to Undetermined Risk.

If one knows all the numbers behind BSE, these terms are not entirely terrible. So far, only known cases of BSE occurred with cattle that were older than 30 months. Less than 1 percent of cattle slaughtered in the U.S. is older than 30 months, and 97 percent is younger than 20 months. Among the cattle older than 30 months, there is about 1 in a million chance that it has BSE. Then the infected SRM has to mix in with non-SRM parts, and then has to be eaten. After all this, the estimated chance of infection through these rules is about one in one billion.

On top of that, consider the fact that in the 20 years since the discovery of BSE, roughly 200 people worldwide died from variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), i.e. the human variant of BSE. (Note 6/3/08: Thank you Jenny B. for the correction to vCJD from foot-and-mouth.) That’s 10 people per year. Shark attack worldwide kills 15 people a year. Now for the probability, compare the number of people who swim near sharks multiplied by the number of times of actual swims, and the number of people who eat beef, multiplied by the number of times of actual consumption!

Even further on top of that, there were only three reported cases of vCJD in the U.S., and as it turns out, all three of them immigrated to the U.S. only several years before being diagnosed with the disease. (Two from Britain, one from Saudi Arabia.) In other words, given that latency of vCJD is over 10 years, it is not American beef that killed them.

But anyone with half a brain can figure out that those terms definitely look bad. Common people know Mad Cow Disease as some deadly disease that spreads through eating soft tissue. So imagine how a regular Korean person, who unlike the Korean is too busy to go through various channels of information, would receive the news: “Wait, so we are importing all those soft tissues? And even if Mad Cow Disease actually happens in America, we can’t stop the importation?”

Legitimate Concerns about American Meat and Korean People

There are some legitimate concerns surrounding American regulations, Korean people’s eating habits, and Korean people’s physiology.

First, U.S. was relatively late addressing cross-infection concerns. One of the ways in which BSE spreads is by mixing in infected SRM into cattle feed. (This disgusting and cannibalistic practice began in Britain, where grain price was too steep to create cattle feed that is 100 percent grain. This is why 80 percent of vCJD occurred in Britain.)

U.S. never really had that practice, but prohibited it anyway once that practice became a problem. However, mixing in SRM for feed for non-ruminating animals (like chickens) was still allowed. Then, theoretically, if a chicken eats BSE-infected SRM, and later parts from that chicken are mixed into cattle feed, the cattle may become infected – i.e. a cross-infection. FDA finally decided to prohibit mixing in SRM from cattle older than 30 months in any animal feed, but the prohibition does not come into effect until April 2009. This is definitely late compared to Europe.

Also, unlike Europe, U.S. only requires sample testing of BSE instead of testing every head of cattle. The sample consists of cows that cannot stand or otherwise failed a physical test. Therefore, it ends up being that only .1 percent of 100 million cows in the U.S. are tested. This is mostly because testing every head of cattle is too expensive in America, where there are many more cows than Europe.

Another legitimate concern is that U.S. is lax in tracking the age of the cow. The 30-month mark is obviously critical. The most accurate method of tracking age is to tag every single head of cattle, but that only happens with 20 percent of the cattle in the U.S. The rest are checked based on teeth and muscle conditions; this method is reasonably accurate, but certainly less accurate than tagging.

On the other side, Korean people’s eating habits are unique in that they consume a lot of soft tissue. Bone soup (featured in the Korean’s article here) is a very popular Korean dish, and Korean barbecue invariably features ribs with bones. Korean people also often eat tripe (= stomach) and small intestines.

Lastly, there was an interesting study that suggested Asians are possibly more susceptible to vCJD. For vast majority of vCJD patients so far, at their 129th genome, Methione/Metionine identicality has been observed. Among Caucasians, the M/M identicality occurs at around 35~40 percent, but among Asians it occurs over 90 percent.

This result is intriguing, but consider this: Caucasian Parkinson’s Disease patients tend to have more H1 haploid compared to H2 haploid in their MAPT genome – the ratio is normally around 8:2, and white Parkinson’s patients have a higher ratio of H1. But for Asians, the ratio is more like 9.9:0.1. So does Asian people get Parkinson’s more often? The answer is no – Parkinson’s disease occurs at the same rate across all races. In other words, it is a stretch to find susceptibility to disease based on a single genome, and while the study above is interesting, it is inconclusive.

Nonetheless, the concern was at least worth looking into, especially given that racist Korean people would eat up the notion that their physiology is somehow different and special. (Described in the Korean’s post here.)

Ridiculously Outrageous False Rumors

But as these things are, crazy false rumors swirled around Korea as opposition to beef import began to form.

Some of them were variants of an existing fact. For example, it is true that SRM from cattle older than 30 months can no longer be used in animal feed in the U.S., as written above. That fact morphed into a rumor that all beef from cattle older than 30 months is unfit for animal feed. Then the predictable reaction from Koreans is: “Americans want us to eat meat that they won’t even feed to their dogs?”

Also, it is true that U.S. imports Australian and Canadian beef, mostly to be used at fast food chains because they are cheaper. That fact turned into a rumor that even Americans won’t eat their own beef and only eat Australian or Canadian beef, and now they are pushing their infected meat to be sold abroad.

It is true that BSE cannot be eliminated by cooking the infected part, because BSE is not caused by bacteria or virus, but a mutated strain of protein. That fact changed into a paranoid whisper that BSE virus is this invincible thing that cannot be destroyed no matter what.

But some rumors are absolutely crazy, like:

- Using any of the 600 products that use cow’s gelatin or collagen, such as cosmetics, maxi pads, diapers, etc., will give you BSE. (Gelatin or collagen is not SRM.)

- BSE is carried through knife or cutting board that touched infected meat. If you wash those things in water, BSE virus will survive in the water through treatment and will eventually infect the drinking water. (Too much Outbreak/28 Days Later. BSE is not caused by virus – one has to eat the infected SRM to catch BSE.)

- There are 5 million Alzheimer’s patient in the U.S., and roughly 250,000~650,000 among them are suspected cases of BSE. (The symptoms of Alzheimer’s and BSE are completely different, and BSE kills within one or two years of diagnosis – anyone notice all demented people dying within two years?)

- Kissing will transmit BSE. (Maybe in Korean dramas.)

Incredibly Stupid Responses by Korean Government

Chris Matthews, in his book Hardball (that’s right, it was a book before there was a TV show,) said after every election, the winning politician must carefully assess whether s/he won, or the other side lost. Did you win because your platform was strong, or did you win because the other side was so terrible? Although grammatically the same, they are two wildly different things in politics.

This question is important because it determines the true amount of political capital you amassed from your victory. Obviously it is smooth sailing if you won through your strength; you can go ahead and implement your policies, and the people will be behind you. However, if you won through the other’s weakness, you must proceed with extreme caution, because your support will disappear in an instant at one misstep.

Apparently, the Lee administration did not bother to ask themselves this most basic question. It was drunk on the landslide victory and did not realize that the victory came mostly from the epic disaster that was Roh presidency, and not as much from Lee’s own track record and policy proposals.

Even before the Mad Cow row, signs of Lee administration’s just “not getting it” were plenty. Even though Lee touted his own resume as a CEO of Hyundai during the election, the economy was no better than before. (Which is in fact natural – despite many promises, there is little that a president can do to revive the economy.) Food price and gas price went up to new heights (as did everywhere else in the world).

But the administration did not fully commit itself to economy; instead it was detracted by self-created distractions. Its selection of cabinet was marred by the (mostly true) allegation that it is stuffed with wealthy cronies of Lee or complete amateurs from universities. In the National Assembly elections held a few months after the presidential election, Lee’s Grand National Party went through a civil war over who would run for the elections, with Lee’s proxies and Park Geun-Hye, the presidential candidate who lost the primary, duking it out. Public confidence in the new presidency fell quickly.

The fact that the beef import negotiation was done so poorly, at a time when Lee administration was hanging on a balance, indicates that Lee administration did not even have the wherewithal to assess the situation they were in. Any Korean with half a brain should have known that beef importation is a sensitive issue. In fact, it has all the indications of a “trouble” issue. It has a small, vocal group of opposition (= cattle farmers) who would begin stoking the fire; it plays right into the general public’s concerns about health and excessive American influence; finally, it deals with fatal disease that is not yet fully understood (and it affects the brain!), which would easily produce sensationalistic headlines.

However, what is more astounding than the poorly negotiated beef market opening is the administration’s even poorer management of public opinion. Even as things were spiraling out of control, the administration never grasped why and how things were spiraling out of control.

The “why” part is what we discussed so far – Korean people was running out of patience with the administration. But the initial reaction by the administration showed no sign that it understood what its people were thinking. President Lee himself offered a pithy comment: “Inner city laborers will be able to eat quality beef for cheap; people with health concerns simply don’t have to eat.” The natural reaction is: So you mean inner city laborers can go ahead and die from Mad Cow Disease? And what if I catch BSE from my lipstick?

Chief negotiator for Korea held a press conference to explain, but only made it worse by saying “It is like being able to eat blowfish after the poison is removed.” First, blowfish is a relatively expensive food, and definitely not something one would eat every day, or even every month. Furthermore, those who cook blowfish in Korea must have a license, and blowfish is rarely processed outside of the restaurant’s kitchen, and never in a large factory through a machine. All in all, it seems as if the negotiator did not spend more than five minutes thinking up that analogy, which appeared consistent with the way he handled the negotiation.

Equally important – and equally ignorant, on the administration’s part – was “how” things managed to spiral out of control. The administration did not seem to realize that South Korea, as one of the world leaders in information technology, has a completely new way of forming public opinions that did not exist 10 years ago when they were last in power.

The Korean public has the closest thing to virtual democracy in the world. They are instantly informed through the Internet (putting aside the issue of whether they are informed with anything more than sensationalistic crap,) and organization comes extremely quickly. The word spreads instantaneously through the vast network of text and instant messaging, and the meeting place is always the same: the City Hall Plaza. A gathering that features tens of thousand people does not take more than a week to organize, and that might be too conservative of an estimate.

Controlling this new world order takes a level of mastery with which this administration is simply not equipped. In this circumstance, like a good basketball drive, the first step matters the most; it is exceedingly difficult to fix the situation when the first step was so egregiously bad. Lee administration did try some methods to fix things online – however, this new, Internet-savvy voting public would have none of the crude methods with which the government tried in order to control information. In fact, it reminds of ill-fated attempts of confused parents trying to connect with their teenage children by talking “cool”.

(One of the ways the Korean saw was a large, flashing pop-up ads on online newspapers that screamed “AMERICAN BEEF, EATEN BY 400 MILLION AMERICANS AND 2.5 MILLION KOREAN AMERICANS, IS COMPLETELY SAFE!!!! YOUR GOVERNMENT WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR HEALTH!!!!” You can't make this stuff up.)

Despite all of his faults as the president, Roh was fantastic in using this new form of public opinion to his advantage – it propelled him all the way to the presidency, and once there, saved him from impeachment. Approached without caution, this force could just as easily undo a presidency, as Lee administration is facing right now.

The Korean is literal in saying “undoing a presidency.” Currently 1.35 million people signed on the online petition calling for President Lee’s impeachment. Although the actual impeachment may be a pipe dream, one prominent conservative newspaper (Dong-A Ilbo) went so far as to call for the resignation of the entire cabinet, and it does seem likely that it will happen.

-EDIT 6/3/08: The Korean had the following paragraph in the draft, and realized it disappeared somehow. Here it is-

And truly, this is the reason why protests continue night after night. It is not because Koreans are dumb enough to really believe those ridiculously crazy rumors about American beef. Koreans want to send a signal to their government that did not understand what they were concerned about. Koreans wanted a government that cared about their health; a government that would hold its own in a negotiation with America; a government that would respect their opinion and attempt to persuade them sincerely, instead of talking down as if they are too stupid to understand. The way Lee administration handled the beef negotiation and the aftermath was the clear sign that this government was badly out of touch. In response, Korean people are taking to the streets every night, trying to slap some sense into it.

What is Happening as of Today

Today, the Korean government decided to delay the official announcement of the opening of beef market. This move de facto signifies that the Korean government will be engaging in some form of renegotiation. The news so far says the government is considering implementing its own quarantine over American beef such that meat from cattle older than 30 months will have a clear designation such that it will not be sold. Also, President Lee is expected to announce major change in his cabinet within a week.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@hotmail.com

-EDIT 6/2/2008- Moments ago the Minister of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries announced that it will ask the U.S. to stop the export of beef from cattle older than 30 months, which is essentially a renegotiation.