Jumat, 14 Desember 2012

Normal Reaction to a Gun

Dear Korean,

I've been a fan of Korean action-thrillers for a while now, but there's something weird that I think only happens in Korean movies: there are almost no guns. Even when the main character is a gangster/assassin/cop is more usual to find them using knives, bats or just kicking around than shooting. And when someone uses one people around them act like they have pulled out a bomb (the recent
Ajeossi for example.) Is there any reason for that (gun control or something)?

Al

The answer to this question is easy, and was partially covered in a previous post about gun control in Korea. Guns are extremely rare in Korea -- private ownership of a gun is virtually nonexistent. 

The recent hit Korean movie 26 Years, which shows the plot to assassinate former president Chun Doo-hwan, gives a good showing of just how difficult it is to obtain a gun in Korea. In the movie, one of the main characters -- a young woman who is an Olympian shooter -- has to resort to a makeshift air-pump gun as her weapon. Most Koreans live their lives without ever seeing a gun, except for males who serve in the military. So if a Korean person saw a gun in ordinary circumstances -- heck, even in relatively unordinary circumstances, like fighting bad guys -- the normal reaction is a stunned paralysis, at least initially.

(source)
Obviously, this post is in reaction to the unspeakable tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut -- another mass shooting, this time killing 27, 18 of them little children. (-EDIT- Now it's 20 children. Good lord.) It is safe to say that this type of event only happens in Korea very, very, very rarely. In fact, mass murder of a comparable scale (outside of military context) happened only once in modern Korean history. In contrast, U.S. has had a mass school shooting -- just school shooting -- once every month since the Columbine High School massacre in 1999.

In fact, the Korean realized something today:  Americans will never know just how much of a peace of mind there can be in a society whose people lack the capacity to kill randomly, how liberating it is to not live in fear of strangers all the time, not to have that dark fear in the corner of our minds that something horrible can happen to our little children because a deranged maniac can obtain guns any time he wants to.

If you still think there is absolutely nothing wrong with America's gun culture after this, go on feeling that way. If the senseless deaths of 20 toddlers do not change your mind about guns, why would this post be any more effective? Go on and keep living in fear of others, hoping that your gun -- your voodoo god of safety -- will ward off the threat. Just know that, in the majority of the civilized world, people feel much safer without that voodoo god in their lives, because it is a savage god that requires constant human sacrifice.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Selasa, 11 Desember 2012

AAK! PSA: Donate to NK News!

The good folks from NK News has this PSA:
Today we’re very happy to announce another new addition to our growing portfolio, THE NK NEWS FUNDRAISING SHOP.

Although NK NEWS is currently run on love, as our reach and audience have expanded, so too have our running costs!

So to keep the ship afloat, we’re running a campaign asking for donations from you, our loyal readers, to help us raise enough money to keep NK NEWS reporting from the frontline of North Korea in 2013.
The fundraising shop has two neat things:  North Korea's Most Wanted card deck, and a calendar with photos from North Korea.

NK News has a feature called Ask a North Korean. Among all the Ask a Korean! knockoffs, the Korean is the proudest for having inspired this knockoff. If you have not yet checked it out, you should.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Jumat, 07 Desember 2012

Quick Thought about PSY's Past Anti-American Lyrics

Imagine you live in Manhattan.

(source)
Now, imagine that, Central Park does not look like this ...

(source)
But instead, looks more like this.

(source)
For maximum emotional effect, imagine those soldiers looked really different from you. There are thousands of those soldiers in Central Park alone, and thousands more all over the state of New York. Also, there is no cross-town bus that goes through the Park. If you lived in Upper West Side and wanted to get to Upper East Side, you had to up all the way up to the 110th street and back down.

Now, think about the implications of having thousands of soldiers in the heart of your city. What would those young men do on their off days? They might visit a brothel. So now, imagine that Upper West Side, between 72th and 79th streets between Central Park West and Amsterdam, has nothing but seedy bars and whorehouses, with ladies soliciting business in the broad daylight, kind of like this:

(source)
But hey, there's more. After all, these are young men. And young men do dumb shit. Like, say, beating up a cab driver (and the NYPD officer that attempted to stop the beating.) Or breaking into a house and raping a young girl. Or rape, kill and brutally mutilate the body of a prostitute. Or (negligently or not, you can't prove it) run over young school girls with their armored car while getting to their training ground in White Plains. Suppose all those things happen once every two or three months. It's so bad that the commanders of those soldiers impose a nighttime curfew to stop those knuckleheads, but they just don't stop.

And worse yet, New York's law enforcement has no power over them. Once these soldiers return to inside of Central Park, NYPD can't even arrest them. Manhattan DAs can't prosecute them. New Yorkers have absolutely no power to do anything about these soldiers.

If you are a New Yorker in this situation, wouldn't you sometimes want to say:  "FUCK THESE PEOPLE"?

This is the situation in Seoul. USFK is located in the heart of Seoul, through no subway or bus may pass. The area of Seoul around the base has been a giant, seedy ghetto. (Although, to be fair, the Itaewon area is currently experiencing a renaissance of sorts.) All the crimes described above -- from petty to horrifying -- actually happened, and are happening now. And until recently, Korean law enforcement had very little power to do anything about it.

Look, the Korean knows that the situation is more nuanced. (It always is.) He, as well as any Korean, is also aware that U.S. played a vital role in securing freedom in South Korea. Without USFK, there is no free Korea. Don't think Korean people are not grateful about that, because they are. The Korean is also aware that many in the USFK do a lot of good in Korea in the form of community service and volunteering. But they are not enough reasons for Koreans to grovel and let everything slide. Inevitably, some Koreans will make an outburst, sometimes publicly, sometimes as a song.

Does this excuse PSY's crude, anti-American lyrics? Of course not, just as much as USFK's good deeds do not excuse some GI's murders and rapes. The point is this: there is a dangerous level of ignorance among Americans as to just how shitty these American soldiers are behaving abroad -- in an allied country, no less! Consequently, there is also a dangerous level of ignorance among Americans as to just how much damage these shitty behaviors are causing to America's standing in the world. The Korean has previously covered this before in a post about how Koreans perceive the USFK, but it bears repeating: if we can't even keep ourselves from pissing off our allies, what hope do we have of turning our enemies to our friends? How can America be so good at exporting its cultural products, yet so terrible at maintaining good relationship with its friends? 

The Korean will skip the factual history that led to PSY's anti-American outburst -- this Busan Haps piece, which sparked into a Washington Post story (and many more,) should be quite enough to give that background. (Note that it came in response to the war in Iraq, which was none too popular in the U.S. either.) Through this post, the Korean wants you, an American, to do what Americans are so bad at doing: thinking about what how things look from the other side, and trying to process why the world sees us the way they do. Then maybe we might understand why a goofy entertainer, who is otherwise content to rap about partying, came to write such angry lyrics.
Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Selasa, 04 Desember 2012

Korea's Presidential Election - Part V: The Minor Candidates

Are you a Korean voter? Are you tired of the two party system? Want to seek alternatives, and cast your lot with the unheralded?

This series went over the three major candidates (one of whom withdrew,) but technically this presidential election has a total of seven candidates. Just for fun, here is a quick look at the five minor candidates who usually are not in the spotlight.

Lee Jeong-hee

Lee Jeong-hee [이정희]
(source)
Party:  Unified Progressive Party
Age:  43
Occupation:  Politician (former attorney)
 
Out of the five minor candidates, Lee Jeong-hee is the most "major" candidate -- she represents a Unified Progressive Party, a far-left party that holds six seats (out of 300) in the National Assembly. Before entering into politics, Lee was an attorney for Lawyers for a Democratic Society, a non-profit group promoting civil rights. She is a two-term National Assembly woman, having won her first election back in 2008.

Lee (and her party UPP) is primarily known as being a communist sympathizer. She refuses to condemn North Korean regime's three generation succession, and abstained from voting for the Assembly resolution condemning North Korea for shelling Yeonpyeong Island in 2010. Her major campaign promises include cancellation of the free trade agreement between Korea and U.S. and special law compensating laborers who were subjected to mass layoffs.

(More after the jump)

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.



Park Jong-seon


Park Jong-seon [박종선]
(source)
Party:  None
Age:  84
Occupation:  None (former entrepreneur)

At age 84, Park Jong-seon is the oldest candidate in the field. He was the former president for Samhyup Enterprises, and accordingly has the highest reported assets among all presidential candidates (around US $4 million.)

Park's major campaign promises include curbing chaebol's abuses, using more Chinese characters and completely cutting off any communication and exchange with North Korea. As you can tell from this sparse entry, no one is quite sure what the heck he is doing in the field.

Kim So-yeon

Kim So-yeon [김소연] (middle)
(source)
Party:  None (loosely affiliated with New Progressive Party)
Age: 42
Occupation:  Labor activist

Kim So-yeon is a long time labor activist. Although she is running as an independent, she is loosely backed by the New Progressive Party, a leftist party that does not hold a seat in the National Assembly. Kim is best known for her efforts to lead the strike in Kiryoong Electronics, which illegally hired part-time workers to replace full-time works (and their benefits.) The strike intermittently lasted six years until the management finally gave into the union's demands. Kim held two hunger strikes in the process, one for 30 days and one for 94 days.

Kim's campaign promises include abolition of mass layoffs and nighttime shifts, nationalization of the financial system, and dissolution of Korea-U.S. alliance.

Kang Ji-won

Kang Ji-won [강지원]
(source)
Party:  None
Age:  63
Occupation:  None (former prosecutor)

Kang might be the most interesting person in the field. As a prosecutor, he focused on preventing crimes against youths. In addition to being a prosecutor, Kang worked as a talk show host, actor, fashion model and opera singer. As a candidate, Kang believes in a policy-focused campaign -- as such, he refuses to make the customary rounds of shaking hands and kissing babies in public. Instead, every day Kang holds a "policy talk show" in his office, and uploads the video on Youtube.

Kang's campaign promises include encouraging a million Koreans to relocate to rural areas, mandating half of all presidentially appointed positions be filled with women, and greater governmental focus on assisting small businesses.

Kim Soon-ja

Kim Soon-ja [김순자]
(source)
Party:  New Progressive Party
Age: 58
Occupation:  Janitor

You read that correctly. Kim probably has the most compelling story out of the field. Kim, having only finished elementary school, had been a simple housewife most of her life. When her husband passed away, she began working as a janitor for Ulsan University at age 49. In 2007, when the university announced mass layoff of the janitorial staff, Kim organized a union and led a protest. After three months of protest, she was able to save the jobs of the janitorial staff, and was awarded the Human Rights Award by the National Commission of Human Rights. She continued working as a janitor until only days before she ran for a seat in the National Assembly in April 2012.

Kim made a number of labor-friendly campaign promises, such as paid rest year after six years of work, minimum wage for everyone, 35-hour work week, etc.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Rabu, 28 November 2012

Korea's Presidential Election - Part IV: The Road Ahead

Having discussed the three major candidates, this part of the series will discuss what is ahead for each candidate (and a former candidate) in the presidential race, which is now less than three weeks away.

Ahn Cheol-soo

Previously, Moon Jae-in and Ahn Cheol-soo had agreed to unify their candidacy to create a single progressive candidate. Since then, the two candidates held and broke off several rounds of negotiations regarding the methodology of the unification. Finally, on November 23, 2012, Ahn abruptly withdrew his candidacy, ceding the progressive candidacy to Democratic United Party's Moon Jae-in.

As far as political aesthetics go, Ahn's move was an inspired one. Ahn's greatest asset as a politician was his image as the new breed of politician, heroically appearing to breathe a fresh air into the old politics. Ahn had no choice but to unite his candidacy -- otherwise, Moon and Ahn would split the progressive votes, guaranteeing Park Geun-hye's victory. But as Ahn grappled with Moon to negotiate the unification of the slate, the value of his prime asset -- i.e. the image -- began to erode. Fighting for every inch of advantage in the proposed mini-primary was the opposite of the "new politics". So was Ahn's attempt to court the DUP Assembly Members and supporters away from Moon. Ahn's numbers began to sink, and he was projecting to lose against Moon in the head-to-head battle. Even if Ahn managed to prevail over Moon, it would be a Pyrrhic victory -- by the time he would face Park Geun-hye, Ahn would have squandered away his prime political asset.

Faced with two unsavory choices, Ahn chose to sublimate. Ahn would not squander away his chief political asset to achieve an intermediate victory that may well turn out to doom his presidential run in the end, nor would he quietly lose to Moon and have a number attached to the margin of his loss. Instead, he would restore the damage that his asset has taken in the last two months -- he would withdraw, cleanly and without making a fuss, and declare his support for Moon Jae-in.

Although Ahn withdrew, his influence remains quite relevant. We have already witnessed his ability to serve as a king-maker -- Ahn did make Park Won-soon, a candidate with around 5% support, into a 53.4%-garnering juggernaut. Ahn did express his support for Moon Jae-in, but how Ahn will express that support going forward may just decide the election.

(More after the jump.)

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.



Moon Jae-in

Moon Jae-in survived the first test -- becoming the unified candidate for the progressives. But the way Ahn Cheol-soo left the field is less than ideal, and Moon must now pick up the pieces.

The best scenario for Moon would have been to actually go through some type of voting or other measurement against Ahn -- the two candidates were discussing some type of survey to decided the winner -- followed by Ahn's enthusiastic support of the camp. This type of organic merging between the two candidates would have given Moon the maximum legitimacy as the unified candidate, and minimized the defection of Ahn's supporters. 

Instead, Moon is now looking like the vanguard of the old politics who railroaded the would-be reformer out of his way. According to a recent survey, majority of Ahn's supporters (52.6%) thought Ahn withdrew because he could not overcome the DUP's pressure. While majority of Ahn's supporters (56.8%) moved on to support Moon, a significant minority (18.9%) now supports Park Geun-hye. Still another significant number of Ahn's supporters fell into the "undecided" group. The "undecided" group, now lacking its star, may choose not to vote. Unless Moon manages to attract the disaffected Ahn's voters, he will lose to Park Geun-hye -- who is now leading majority of the head-to-head polls against Moon Jae-in by 2 to 3 percentage points. 

As of now, Ahn's support of Moon is lukewarm as well. Although it has been several days since Ahn withdrew, he did not yet make any public appearance. Also, rather than officially joining Moon's camp, Ahn is apparently planning to independently campaign for Moon -- further diminishing the possible synergy that Ahn could create for Moon. Ahn has indicated that he will campaign for Moon in a week or so, to maximize Ahn's contribution to Moon's victory. The fear, however, is that the help might come too late.

Meanwhile, the very unpopular presidency of Roh Moo-hyun continues to act as the millstone around Moon's neck. Conservative newspapers are already eager to paint Moon as the second coming Roh, which is not exactly unfair given Moon's close relationship to Roh Moo-hyun as a person as well as the president. Although Moon has a ready counterattack against Park Geun-hye by tying her to her father's legacy, it simply does not pack the same punch, as sufficient number of Koreans are quite satisfied with how they fared under Park Chung-hee.

Park Geun-hye

So, after a long detour, Korea's presidential election may have come back to where it was around three months ago: that is, Park Geun-hye's to lose. And Park's campaign is surely acting like it. For months, Park Geun-hye was on a steady march to the left -- she promised an expanded welfare state and abruptly changed her stance on her father's coup d'etat from "best possible choice" to "damages to constitutional values."

Yet, around a month ago, Park's campaign switched focus and began concentrating on galvanizing its base. It quietly dropped the slogan for "economic democratization," and dumped the prominent economic advisor Kim Jong-in who vocally called for chaebol reform. Park's campaign also began to raise questions about Roh Moo-hyun's handling of North Korea relations, which plays well for Korea's hawkish conservatives. Faced with another crisis in connection with her father's legacy -- this time, regarding the "scholarship foundation" that manages Park Chung-hee's leftover slush funds -- Park chose to stand tall, insisting that the foundation had nothing to do with her.

Park's campaign does have one message that is aimed for the undecided voters -- the "woman president" line. This message is working to some degree, especially among women voters in their 40s. To reinforce the message, Park has been focusing on "women-friendly" campaign promises, such as harsher prosecution for violence against women.

In sum, Park's campaign strategy is: (1) hold the base, and (2) win just enough undecided voters through the "woman president" line. It is quite Karl Rove-esque -- calculating, rather than inspiring. And it just might work.

The next parts of the series will go over major campaign promises, the minor candidates, and the Korean's endorsement.

Got a question or comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Selasa, 27 November 2012

AAK! PSA: Red Maria

Below is an interesting event in Seoul:

[Red Maria <레드마리아> film screening 상영회 + Q&A with Director Kyung Soon 경순 감독과의 대화]



★ YOU MUST RSVP via Email: womens.global.solidarity@gmail.com ★

In Korea, Japan and The Philippines, there are many women with diverse jobs and her stories. Among them, this film focuses on women who are called housewives, sex workers, dispatched workers, migrant workers, comfort women, homeless and so on. The camera tracks them as they go about their everyday lives. These women have never met one another, and their lives look quite different from one another. However, their lives are connected across national borders by the one thing they have in common. That's their bodies and labor. How can such different forms of labor be linked to the women's bodies in such a similar way? As we search for answers to this question, we are forced to confront another question: 'the meaning of labor' as an ideology that is reproduced in society.

* Entrance Fee: by donation at the door

* Languages: Korean, Japanese, Tagalog and English with English subtitles

* Naver map: http://me2.do/GDOEbSP

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/events/370272919729052/

The screening will be held at the Columban Mission Center.
Please note the center is very close to exit 4, and not on the University's campus.

To get to the center:
1) Take line 4 to the Sungshin Women's University Entrance 성신여자대학교입구) stop.
2) Go out exit 4 and a building with a traditional Korean roof (hanok) will be in front of you.
3) Go into the building and up to the second floor.

★ Due to a limited number of seats, you must RSVP to womens.global.solidarity@gmail.com and you will receive confirmation when your seat has been reserved.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.

Selasa, 20 November 2012

Korea's Presidential Election - Part III: Ahn Cheol-soo

Part III of this series will discuss Ahn Cheol-soo, an independent candidate.

Ahn Cheol-soo (Independent)

Ahn Cheol-soo [안철수]
(source)
Ahn Cheol-soo was born in 1962, which makes him around ten years younger than both Park Geun-hye and Moon Jae-in. That fact, coupled with Ahn's biography, puts Ahn in a fundamentally different position from both Park and Moon. Unlike Park and Moon, Ahn is not tethered to Korea's tortured past of the 1970s -- which is one of the reasons why he has enjoyed such massive popularity as an independent.

Ahn was born in Busan. Ahn's childhood was unremarkable, which is actually remarkable for a middle-aged Korean. In the tumultuous times of Korea in the 1960s and 70s, few in Korea had a normal childhood. Recall that Park Geun-hye lost both her parents to political assassination, or that Moon Jae-in grew up in dire poverty in a Korean War refugee camp. In contrast, Ahn's youth had no drama. Ahn's father was a doctor who had (and still has) a small medical office in Busan. Ahn grew up living a comfortable but not lavish life, as a bookish student.

Ahn began his career as a research doctor after having graduated from Seoul National University school of medicine in 1986. Only four years later, he would serve as a dean of Danguk University school of medicine at age 27, the youngest dean in Korean higher education history. Ahn's research focus was in irregular heartbeat.

(More after the jump)

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.





While attending college, Ahn began to develop what was then a rare hobby -- computer programming. Ahn saw a computer for the first time in 1982, and taught himself how to build computer programs. In 1986, Ahn encountered, for the first time, a program that was designed to destroy computers and floppy disks -- a new, deleterious program called "computer virus." Ahn read an article about computer virus in a magazine, and checked his own computer. And there it was -- a computer virus in his computer. First, Ahn manually removed the virus, and told those around him how to do the same. Later, in 1988, Ahn built a program that would automatically detect and remove computer virus, and named the program "V1", with "v" standing for "vaccine." V1 was one of the first anti-virus programs in the world, as the first documented case of anti-virus program was made in 1987.

What Ahn did next would warm the heart of every computer nerd. By day, Ahn continued his teaching career as a post-doctorate graduate student. By night, Ahn would update his antivirus program -- which gradually changed its name to V2, V2-Plus, etc. -- to fend off the latest wave of computer virus, and distributed the program for free. According to Ahn's wife, Ahn pulled an all-nighter updating the antivirus program on the night before he had to report to his military service, then barely made it to the training camp on time. He would continue this lifestyle for seven years.

In 1995, Ahn finally decided to abandon his career as a doctor and focus solely on programming by founding Ahnlab, Inc. his own company. Ahnlab continued to provide free antivirus programs for consumers, and only charged corporations for its programs. After struggling for the first few years, Ahnlab took off in 1999, as the age of high-speed Internet (and the attendant problems with computer virus) dawned upon Korea. Overnight, Ahn became a millionaire.

In 2005, Ahn resigned from his post as the CEO of Ahnlab, as he decided that he wanted to study further. He studied business for three years in Stanford and the Wharton School, and returned to Korea in 2008 as the professor of KAIST business school. In 2011, Ahn was appointed to be the dean of SNU's Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology.

Ahn's foray into politics began indirectly, and no one -- possibly, not even Ahn himself -- really knows whether Ahn intended to enter into politics. Ahn began to occupy Korea's public consciousness around 2009, thanks to a well-received television interview about his life. Beginning in mid-2011, Ahn began holding a series of "talk concerts," usually in a small, intimate theater in front of an audience of mostly 20- and 30-year-olds. In a "talk concert," Ahn would have a down-to-earth conversation with his friends on stage regarding the topics that are the most pressing for the audience. The audience came away impressed with Ahn's ability to simultaneously communicate with and inspire the people around him. His name was increasingly spoken with reverence.

Ahn's potential as a politician exploded onto Korea's political scene, when a person close to Ahn leaked to the press that Ahn was considering running for Seoul's mayoral seat in September 2011. The torrent of support for Ahn was unprecedented in its speed and scale in Korean political history, which is quite a statement considering its wild volatility. After the news leaked -- but before Ahn made any official statement -- every poll showed an overwhelming lead for Ahn as the favorite for the mayoral seat, with over 50% of those who were surveyed supporting Ahn.

But in a shocking move, Ahn declared that he would not run; instead, he would support an independent candidate named Park Won-soon, a former human rights lawyer who was barely polling at 5%. As it turned out, the Ahn Cheol-soo sensation was transferable; overnight, Park's support shot up to over 50% as well. Park Won-soon cruised to victory, winning 53.4% of all votes. The Ahn Cheol-soo phenomenon would live on for the next year, gripping Koreans with will-he-or-won't-he questions about the upcoming presidential election. Finally, Ahn ended all suspense by declaring his candidacy for president in September of this year.

Although Ahn remained independent and did not join any party, he made quite clear from the beginning of his political career that he stands opposed to the conservative NFP, labeling them as the corrupt practitioners of the "old politics." Ahn had less disdain for the DUP, but only slightly. While Ahn broadly shared the stated policy goals of the progressives -- i.e. greater regulation of Korea's conglomerates, expansion of the welfare state, etc. -- Ahn also branded the 10-years of DUP's rule previous to the current presidents' as another variation of the old politics.

Ahn's candidacy had an immediate impact: it stopped dead the momentum of Park Geun-hye, who had been the front-runner in the polls for months. In polls after polls (assuming a head-to-head race between Park and Ahn,) Ahn would easily lead Park by double-digits. This result re-energized Korea's progressives, who were all but resigned to the coming Park Geun-hye presidency. Ahn's ascendancy also gave a new focal point for the factions within the DUP that did not wish to follow Moon Jae-in's lead.

However, Ahn could not simply run for the presidency alongside Moon Jae-in. Doing so would divide the progressive votes, which then would guarantee Park Geun-hye's victory. After some negotiation, Moon and Ahn agreed to unify their candidacy earlier this month. The result of that negotiation may well determine the outcome of this presidential election.

Next part will discuss the current lay of the land for the campaign, and what each campaign must do to emerge victorious.

Got a question or a comment for the Korean? Email away at askakorean@gmail.com.